[identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com 2011-10-13 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)
- maybe she was very biased in favour of the Pill because she saw lots of young female students having unwanted pregnancies or at least pregnancies scares

Yeah - I think this is a specific example of where my thinking on GP production lines generally has got to today. it sounds like it was too difficult / time consuming / expensive to treat you as you and not (mistakenly) as one of a class of people who had identical issues and could be treated in an identical way.

Maybe I'm just an overeducated awkward person but I find doctors who tell me what to do mostly patronising.

I am nothing if not over educated but I quite like the idea of being told what to do by a doctor, especially when I know in my heart of hearts I agree with them.

[identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com 2011-10-13 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe the agreeing in your heart of hearts is the crucial bit here - in my heart of hearts I have a possibly irrational hatred of the idea of messing with my hormones. Also I don't think the Pill is necessarily a safer contraception method than properly used barrier methods and get annoyed because I think doctors generally overstate its effectiveness and understate the possible side effects (http://www.contraceptivetechnology.org/table.html backs me up on this - perfect use of condoms* is more effective than typical use of the Pill). Doctors never seem to be very keen on pointing out how many things can reduce the effectiveness of the Pill, like having a dodgy stomach or taking OTC cold & flu remedies, never mind the number of prescribed antibiotics that stop it working.

*I realise that isn't a like for like comparison but perfect use of condoms isn't that hard to get right if you and your partner are careful.

Sorry, pet rant ;) Fortunately for me, my partner has had a vasectomy so I get to avoid the issue these days.