andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2011-08-22 02:17 pm

Why I won't be reading A Clash Of Kings until I've seen season two of Game Of Thrones

I loved the book of Game Of Thrones. But only once I'd read the TV series.

I know this is an unpopular opinion in some circles, so I thought I'd
explain why this is the case (and thus why you might feel differently to
me).

I tried to read it twice before I saw the TV series. And although I could
tell the writing style was good I found it almost impossible to follow,
because I just can't "meet" that many people at once and keep them straight
in my head.

I have the same problem in work. I frequently work in teams of 30+ people
(and my last major project was about 70 people), and it takes me _at least_
four interactions with a person before I have a hope in hell of remembering
their name, and frequently several more, if their name hasn't come up in
those interactions.

Names just don't mean anything to me. They're random collections of
syllables that just happen to be associated with a person. And remember
random collections of things is not what my brain is good at (I failed
A-Level Chemistry because it was basically an exercise in remembering all
of the reactions that organic molecules have, and those would just slide
off of my brain like hot butter off a lipid-resistant duck).

And so I read the first chapter, managed to keep the people in it mostly
straight, despaired when I was instantly introduced to another group of
more than half a dozen people (and it became obvious that those earlier
people were mostly not going to be integral to the plot, but were just
there to introduce us to plot), and then when the third lot of people
introduced I quietly put the book to one side.

The TV series helped enormously. Suddenly I was dealing with people. I
could keep track of them easily, because they looked different. And
because they kept using each other's names, I quickly picked up who they
were.

Which meant that after I finished the TV series, I could pick up the book,
follow it without problems, and enjoy all of the extra detail it contained.

So, when the next TV series comes out, I will be watching that, and then
reading the book, so that I can enjoy its expansion of what I enjoyed. But
not before.

[identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Very entertaining! I was surprised by the Lannisters as Ravenclaw to start with but then I decided that I agree the dragon lot make better Slytherines.

[identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

And, yeah, you have to have the ones who can talk to reptiles be Syltherins.

[identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I had forgotten about that until I read your summaries, Dany and the dragons bored me rather in the books.

[identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
She's much more interesting for some reason in the series than in the first book - even though she does exactly the same things. I can't figure out exactly why.

[identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I found that too. The actress managed to be quite engaging somehow but I can't put my finger on exactly how.

[identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
It may be that she is the only "adult" female character who isn't a complete idiot (Ned's wife with the kidnapping she didn't have to do that kicked off the whole war) crazy (Ned's Wife's Sister), evil (The queen), a slave or a prostitute.

Strong, smart non evil female characters are compelling and she's the only one they gave us.

[identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com 2011-08-22 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly. We do get more good adult female characters as the series goes on.