I still object to the dropping of appeals though - the whole point of appeals is to apply scrutiny to decisions that may well be wrong. If a percentage of people are winning their appeal that tells me that the initial decisions _are_ sometimes wrong, and thus an appeal process is necessary.
Oh absolutely. Appeals processes should be sacrosanct.
And you know my opinion - we should have basically open borders, and put the money we currently spend on keeping people out into helping people who are here integrate instead (ESOL classes and so on).
But the main point seems to be a non-story - or at worst, some kind of harmonisation of Commonwealth immigration rules to be closer to non-Commonwealth ones.
no subject
I still object to the dropping of appeals though - the whole point of appeals is to apply scrutiny to decisions that may well be wrong. If a percentage of people are winning their appeal that tells me that the initial decisions _are_ sometimes wrong, and thus an appeal process is necessary.
no subject
And you know my opinion - we should have basically open borders, and put the money we currently spend on keeping people out into helping people who are here integrate instead (ESOL classes and so on).
But the main point seems to be a non-story - or at worst, some kind of harmonisation of Commonwealth immigration rules to be closer to non-Commonwealth ones.