The preferred subjects list seems to be much the same as it's been for quite some time, Maths + 2 other sciences to study a science is normal in my opinion. If your school has not brought this to pupils attention and let them do unlisted subjects then it's the schools (and pupils) fault not the universities and changes should be made at school level not at universities. The current trend to bash the top universities for expecting standards is ridiculous. Private schools prepare their pupils for top level university study - if I was a fee paying parent I would expect that as a matter of course. Some schools are bad, some are good - ranting in the media about preferencial treatment does not help this. Improving bad comprehensives is a large task that may never bear fruit.
"If your school has not brought this to pupils attention and let them do unlisted subjects then it's the schools (and pupils) fault not the universities and changes should be made at school level not at universities."
Yes, I agree completely. A school I was at for some volunteering (www.youarehiredplymouth.co.uk) last week had most of their sixth formers doing stuff like Business and Travel & Tourism at A-level. That essentially makes it impossible for that school ever to send candidates to the best universities.
Are the top universities expecting standards, or are they simply prejudiced? I really don't know. Is there a study showing that non-traditional A levels are correlated with lower final degree classifications?
Because on the face of it, it seems perfectly plausible that admissions tutors are just selecting people like themselves and subjects like they did back in the 20th century.
In the short term, it makes no difference to students' best choices for getting into uni, but in the medium to long term it makes a hell of a lot of difference.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
If your school has not brought this to pupils attention and let them do unlisted subjects then it's the schools (and pupils) fault not the universities and changes should be made at school level not at universities.
The current trend to bash the top universities for expecting standards is ridiculous. Private schools prepare their pupils for top level university study - if I was a fee paying parent I would expect that as a matter of course.
Some schools are bad, some are good - ranting in the media about preferencial treatment does not help this. Improving bad comprehensives is a large task that may never bear fruit.
no subject
Yes, I agree completely. A school I was at for some volunteering (www.youarehiredplymouth.co.uk) last week had most of their sixth formers doing stuff like Business and Travel & Tourism at A-level. That essentially makes it impossible for that school ever to send candidates to the best universities.
no subject
Because on the face of it, it seems perfectly plausible that admissions tutors are just selecting people like themselves and subjects like they did back in the 20th century.
In the short term, it makes no difference to students' best choices for getting into uni, but in the medium to long term it makes a hell of a lot of difference.