In fairness, those proportions are more realistic, in particular, the shape of her torso, her abdomen and her backside are way, way better in the newer model - particularly pleasing is the fact she actually has a slightly convex belly. Sure, she's still way too skinny to be 'average' (particularly in the thigh department from what we can see) but there are actually women shaped that way. No one is shaped like 90s Barbie.
Really what might be nice would be a combination of the two - the shape of the 00s Barbie but with more of the proportion of the 90s one - a broader ribcage and hips maybe, bigger thighs - combined with the new shape we might actually get a nice figure that way. Frankly, though, I'd prefer new Barbie to 90s Barbie any day.
It's admittedly harder to tell, considering the untimely decapitation of the older model in those pictures, but I think the slender ribcage contributes to her head's looking even more freakishly large.
That being said, I agree: I've never seen a human woman shaped like '90s Barbie, I have seen ones who look like the more recent Barbie. I'm sure the manufacturers claim they're just saving on plastic, though....
Someone observed in comments that the dolls' heads need to be proportionately overlarge because the clothing is so much proportionately thicker that otherwise the heads would look undersized on the dressed doll - and, after all, they're meant to be dressed, not naked.
Oh, good point. I guess most of my Barbies ended up naked, dismembered, and crayoned-upon, but I was rough on my toys as a wee thing.
When they were in high school, my mother and her sister used to make Barbie clothes, and when I was older I was allowed access to their '60s dolls and wardrobes. I always liked the Barbies that had the little pixie cuts so short their hair was made of plastic, just like Ken's; it seemed somehow more efficient and truer to the exercise.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Really what might be nice would be a combination of the two - the shape of the 00s Barbie but with more of the proportion of the 90s one - a broader ribcage and hips maybe, bigger thighs - combined with the new shape we might actually get a nice figure that way. Frankly, though, I'd prefer new Barbie to 90s Barbie any day.
no subject
That being said, I agree: I've never seen a human woman shaped like '90s Barbie, I have seen ones who look like the more recent Barbie. I'm sure the manufacturers claim they're just saving on plastic, though....
no subject
no subject
When they were in high school, my mother and her sister used to make Barbie clothes, and when I was older I was allowed access to their '60s dolls and wardrobes. I always liked the Barbies that had the little pixie cuts so short their hair was made of plastic, just like Ken's; it seemed somehow more efficient and truer to the exercise.