andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2010-12-18 11:01 am
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 12-18-2010

[identity profile] fub.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
It is refreshing to read an article in mainstream media that explains correlation and causality in such a clear way. More people need to read this -- I've posted it on my twitter and will report in my LJ. Thanks!

[identity profile] draconid.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Just don't read the comments on the article - far too many people are missing the point!

[identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but there are some gems, like this one:
"Two possibilities

The sight of a mobile phone mast creates associations in women's brains and stimulates their sexual appetite.

It is easier to have sex when talking on a mobile phone, than when talking on a fixed line phone."

[identity profile] draconid.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I did quite like that one. :)

[identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Which article was that?

[identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, well written. It exposes the fundamental flaw in the data:

"As the population of an area goes up, so do both the number of mobile phone users and the number people giving birth."

Wha---? The birth rate figure is only meaningful in this context if it's expressed RELATIVE TO THE POPULATION DENSITY!!!!! Otherwise, it's just balls. The number of Tesco Metros is proportional to the birth rate; doesn't mean people are screwing in the aisles!