andrewducker: (wanking)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2010-11-21 11:23 am

Now that's a nice hat


via lproven over on Twitter.

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)
What's the context?

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh I see - it's some sort of atheist gate crashing of an event for Catholic Youth.

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
To be honest I find it extremely sad that they chose to 'protest' this Catholic Youth Day. Imagine if the Catholics protested (by way of mockery) at humanist youth events, I think we'd all agree that's pretty out of order.

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I can see the validity of a protest against the Pope more than I can see the validity of a protest against a youth event.

Of course people are free to protest against anything they want - I'd fight to defend that right for everyone whatever their beliefs, but in the same way that I think that the protests of Fred Phelps are suspect I think some protests are more reasonable than others.

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, at least we know they had a really amusing float!

[identity profile] ipslore.livejournal.com 2010-11-21 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
In my experience, there's usually a 'sense of humor' asymmetry in stuff like this. Which means that a) Catholics don't mock humanist events, and b) even if they did, the humanists would be able to take it.

[identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com 2010-11-22 10:18 am (UTC)(link)
I see no evidence that the RCC are 'unable to take it' (I'm not a RCC btw).

I suspect the RCC don't mock humanist events because they (at the corporate level at least) think that mockery is a poor way to interact with people of different beliefs.