[identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Nuclear power has never worried me in the slightest. And don't forget that if anything bad does happen, then we all get cool superhero powers from the radioactivity. It's a win-win situation!

Also, don't forget fusion power, which (as far as I'm aware) results in no radioactive waste.

Re: I can never resist a Red Dward reference

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
And last I heard thirty years was optimistic.

Re: I can never resist a Red Dward reference

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I heard "forty years after you start funding it properly"

Re: I can never resist a Red Dward reference

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
On the other hand, when (weak) Artificial Intelligence works we stop calling it AI.

For example, we used to refer to rule-based systems as expert systems and treat them as AI magic. Nowadays, there are rule-based systems at the heart of many software projects - and noone thinks twice about them.

Re: I can never resist a Red Dward reference

[identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com 2010-08-18 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
'AI of the Gaps'

Re: I can never resist a Red Dward reference

[identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 12:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh, yeah, they seem to have been saying it's 20-30 years away for the last... 50 years?

[identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com 2010-08-16 12:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I ~think~ that while fusion itself doesn't result in radioactive waste, it will however strongly irradiate the machinery and containment apparatus of the reactor itself, resulting in a problem when it comes time to decommission.

But, compared to the fission byproducts, this is a drop in the ocean.