Stupid idea of the day

[andrewducker]

If voting took place over a couple of days, with counting going on simultaneously, and the results available in real time, then this would encourage more people to participate as time went on, if they saw that the result was close, and thus their vote mattered.

Has this ever been tried, and if so, what appalling side-effects did it have?

Comments

[gonzo21.livejournal.com]

I used to have a lot of frought arguments with friends who said much the same thing. Or at least, they felt there was no point voting for the party they wanted, because they had no chance of winning.

When I pointed out that thinking is precisely why the Lib Dems don't win more seats, they always just seem to shrug and say 'But they won't win anyway, so I'm not bothering'.