andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-07-23 09:07 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Something I'd like to see
A list of facts (or groupings of facts) learned in schools, and then a percentage, for each one, of how often they were used in the last year (by a large, varied, sample of the population).
Not that I think that teaching ought to be based entirely on utility, but if we could at least quantify that utility then we could look at the bits that aren't actually useful and start the argument over whether they're worthwhile on other bases (artistically/culturally worthy).
Not that I think that teaching ought to be based entirely on utility, but if we could at least quantify that utility then we could look at the bits that aren't actually useful and start the argument over whether they're worthwhile on other bases (artistically/culturally worthy).
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Exceptions for basic English and mathematics.)
(no subject)
no subject
One argument in favor of your point is that there are vastly more facts, today, than there were a few years ago (especially if revisions/reversals of what were previously considered facts are taken into consideration) -- far more than any one person can learn.
As others have pointed out, what really needs to be learned is how to find information/facts and how to evaluate the quality of what one finds. I don't know about the U.K., but here in the U.S. the current educational trend (abetted by the No Child Left Behind fiasco and demands for Objective Testing) appears to ignore these useful skills and concentrate on teaching a relatively small and quite arbitrary list of facts.
(If anything more were needed to confirm my feeling that the U.S. is doomed to become a second-rate country in the near future, for a generation or more, that would do it.)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
He told me recently that our education model (in the US) is still based on a pre-world-war-one model for an agrarian society.