innerbrat: (smart)

[personal profile] innerbrat 2010-07-16 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
In which case: c) you tax the things that create the greatest cost for you. Discouragement and fund raising work together in beautiful harmony.

e.g. smoking, driving in London.
innerbrat: (london)

[personal profile] innerbrat 2010-07-16 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
actually, scrap that, driving in London doesn't create cost; running the Congestion Chrage system creates cost.

Never mind!
innerbrat: (london)

[personal profile] innerbrat 2010-07-16 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
It's ALSO a way of generating income, though. Sadly, it was too good at the former to effectively do the latter, which is why the cost was raise.
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2010-07-16 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Is what I meant when I ticked the first option. Pigou was a clever bloke. Are you intentionally channelling one of the greatest economists ever, or is that excellent summary entirely your own? ;-)
innerbrat: (blonde)

[personal profile] innerbrat 2010-07-16 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
If I ask who the hell Pigou was, does that answer your question?

[identity profile] xquiq.livejournal.com 2010-07-17 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Pigouvian tac is a great idea. Hellishly difficult to implement although London are doing a good deal better than I originally expected.