[identity profile] major-clanger.livejournal.com 2010-04-28 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
The online dating article is interesting (as are all the posts on OkCupid's blog - I love the way they have a tame stats geek writing it) but it is more a critique of a particular model of pay-dating site. I've just had a spectacular success with paid membership of Guardian Soulmates - let's just say neither I nor my new girlfriend are paid members any more - but its operating model does seem rather different to the sites that article is criticising.

[GSM allows very basic messaging without paying, and has a quite sophisticated compatibility searching model. As such you can trawl and make initial contact without having to pay if you want, although you get rather better and more tunable search options if you do. Of course I am now showing the bias of someone who succeeded, but I think my four months' subs may prove to be the best £80 I spent in a long time.]

[identity profile] broin.livejournal.com 2010-04-28 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
The Guardian have a dating site?

Whose joke was it about 'The Nazis might have been bad, but no-one has ever fantasised about being tied to a chair by a liberal'? :D

[identity profile] broin.livejournal.com 2010-04-28 02:00 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a pretty good site. And everyone appears to be spelling.

[identity profile] major-clanger.livejournal.com 2010-04-28 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Not all of us blog all the time to everyone about everything that happens to us ;-)

[identity profile] major-clanger.livejournal.com 2010-04-28 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I was teasing!

(And I'd quite enjoy #1, in a sort of vicarious-gaming way seeing as how I rarely have the time or opportunity at the moment).