2010-02-11

andrewducker: (Default)
2010-02-11 08:19 am

God, I'm _so_ not funny this morning


Make your own here. Post them in the comments. Make them funnier than my terrible effort.
via [livejournal.com profile] nihilistic_kid
andrewducker: (Default)
2010-02-11 02:35 pm

Charlie Wilson - RIP

If you haven't seen Charlie Wilson's War, the true story of the Texan Congressman who helped fund the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 80s, then I really highly recommend it.

More here
andrewducker: (Default)
2010-02-11 03:11 pm

Thinking about code

  If I have a method:
int DoSomething(string someStuff)
{
  //Do Stuff
  return 42;
}
then effectively I have an unnamed variable that gets set by the return statement, yes?

That being the case, wouldn't it be in some ways clearer to have an explicit, named, variable that gets set instead?

int DoSomething(string someStuff)
{
  //Do Stuff
  returnValue = 42;
}

where "returnValue" is a keyword that's used to return the value.

As it is I frequently end up with code that creates (or sets) a variable at various points through the code just so it can be returned at the end.  Making this an explicit part of the language just makes sense to me.

I assume there are languages out there that do this.