andrewducker (
andrewducker
) wrote
2010
-
04
-
22
11:07 am
Voting
Help
andrewducker
and
get your own badge
!
(The Livejournal Electioniser was made by
robhu
)
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
bracknellexile.livejournal.com
2010-04-22 11:09 am (UTC)
(
link
)
So will you be posting the election results the day before polling?
no subject
robhu.livejournal.com
2010-04-22 11:10 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Ooh, let's see if we can persuade him to do that but with the lottery results ;-)
no subject
andrewducker
2010-04-22 11:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hung parliament. Lib Dems to have clearly got a higher percentage of the vote than their number of seats suggests, and this to cause a large fuss :->
no subject
chuma.livejournal.com
2010-04-22 11:56 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I'll go one step further on this prediction. Tories to have the largest share of the vote and get less seats than Labour.
no subject
andrewducker
2010-04-22 12:00 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Yup, I agree.
Vote results: Conservatives->Lib Dem->Labour
Seat results: Labour->Conservatives->Lib Dem
Public to get very confused and upset.
no subject
lpetrazickis.livejournal.com
2010-04-22 01:57 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Fun results from the
1936 Canadian federal election in Manitoba
:
Conservatives, 42%, 0 seats
Lib-Progs, 20%, 7 seats
Liberals, 18%, 4 seats
Progressives, 11%, 4 seats
Labour, 8%, 2 seats
no subject
andrewducker
2010-04-22 04:58 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Insanity!
38 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Vote results: Conservatives->Lib Dem->Labour
Seat results: Labour->Conservatives->Lib Dem
Public to get very confused and upset.
no subject
Conservatives, 42%, 0 seats
Lib-Progs, 20%, 7 seats
Liberals, 18%, 4 seats
Progressives, 11%, 4 seats
Labour, 8%, 2 seats
no subject