andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-04-19 01:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why I'm in favour of Proportional Representation
According to the BBC, the current polls show Lib Dems on 33%, Conservatives on 32%, Labour on 26%.
Which would give a seat allocation of Conservatives: 246, Labour 241, Lib Dems: 134.
Or, in a more easily digestible table format:
It should be pretty fucking obvious that this is an electoral system that is fucked in the head.
Which would give a seat allocation of Conservatives: 246, Labour 241, Lib Dems: 134.
Or, in a more easily digestible table format:
Party | Percentage | Seats |
Lib Dems | 33% | 134 |
Conservatives | 32% | 246 |
Labour | 26% | 241 |
It should be pretty fucking obvious that this is an electoral system that is fucked in the head.
Re: for the slow american in the room
Re: for the slow american in the room
The Democrats under Dean, Pelosi and Obama are right of the Tories? SRSLY?
Have you looked at the Tory policy platform?
Re: for the slow american in the room
Or, for that matter, the Tories want to let toffs hunt foxes again, but they're not proposing that just anyone be allowed guns.
Re: for the slow american in the room
They've dragged US health care to the "left" of where it was, significantly. Cameron plans to drag it to the "right" significantly in a number of ways (some of which I approve of, mostly I don't).
The NHS is such a touchstone issue he can't afford to be seen to be attacknig it (but look up Dan Hannan's comments on it, or Douglas CArswells).
Politicians react to their home electorate, Tories largely want to do things that they know they can't get away with, although given the collapse of their campaign they seem to be lurching right anyway.