andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-04-19 01:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why I'm in favour of Proportional Representation
According to the BBC, the current polls show Lib Dems on 33%, Conservatives on 32%, Labour on 26%.
Which would give a seat allocation of Conservatives: 246, Labour 241, Lib Dems: 134.
Or, in a more easily digestible table format:
It should be pretty fucking obvious that this is an electoral system that is fucked in the head.
Which would give a seat allocation of Conservatives: 246, Labour 241, Lib Dems: 134.
Or, in a more easily digestible table format:
Party | Percentage | Seats |
Lib Dems | 33% | 134 |
Conservatives | 32% | 246 |
Labour | 26% | 241 |
It should be pretty fucking obvious that this is an electoral system that is fucked in the head.
no subject
Whereas with the STV method you just have bigger areas, with multiple MSPs to return. This has the advantage that you can choose the order in which you support your MPs. You can choose to support a Labour one who is anti war, then two Lib-Dems, then a Green MP and then the Labour one who is pro-war, and then two Conservatives, before the UKIP get anywhere near your vote :->
This means that voters get to shape the party they vote for - if everyone votes for the anti-war Labour MPs then we still have a Labour party, but now they aren't in favour of war! (Not that I see that as likely, but you see my point).