I found that, but it still wasn't clear what property of a film they were comparing to it. They said "shot rhythm", which would make me think the obvious guess was that if you split the film up into individual shots you'd find that shots of a given length occurred in inverse proportion to that length (though it's unclear whether that would be counting by number or by total length, which makes quite a difference!) – but that's got relatively little to do with 1/f noise that I can see.
Sadly, I can't find any detail which explains what they're actually going on about. Especially as Google searches for 1/f are less than entirely useful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2010-02-24 11:01 am
no subject
no subject
no subject