[identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com 2010-01-27 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)
You can file it under selfish, but I don't think it can be put down to ignorance. Healthcare reform would undoubtedly provide better heathcare for those currently without insurance. But I'm not sure it would improve the service received by those currently insured. Nobody is suggesting that there should be state-provided healthcare, only some sort of state-funded insurance policy.

[identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com 2010-01-27 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
By service I don't mean the medical care itself but access to it; the service you get from your insurance company. So, for example, reducing discrimination for pre-existing conditions, deductibles and other out of pocket expenses (on top of the insurance), caps on what insurance companies will cover.

And people with insurance may not always have it, particularly since it is often tied to employment, which again is addressed by the public option (which isn't the same as a state-funded insurance policy, merely a universal, affordable private insurance scheme).