Oh, from an ontological point of view, it's daft. ;)
But then you'd have no problem with citations and attribution, fewer problems with copyright and plagiarism... from a strictly academic user's perspective, it'd be amazing.
But then it's almost the opposite of small pieces, loosely joined. And that I'd have to cite who said that and where and when before submitting this post would also reduce the poetry, somewhat.
A Xanadish approach would have been interesting during 1993 - 1996, for me, as pages got lost and were deleted a lot, and the spiders couldn't keep track. Doesn't happen so much any more.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
But then you'd have no problem with citations and attribution, fewer problems with copyright and plagiarism... from a strictly academic user's perspective, it'd be amazing.
But then it's almost the opposite of small pieces, loosely joined. And that I'd have to cite who said that and where and when before submitting this post would also reduce the poetry, somewhat.
A Xanadish approach would have been interesting during 1993 - 1996, for me, as pages got lost and were deleted a lot, and the spiders couldn't keep track. Doesn't happen so much any more.