andrewducker: (calvin dancing)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-07-28 02:33 pm

Language and Aspergers

This very much sums up how I feel, on a semi-regular basis.  It's an article about how people with Aserpgers interpret language differently to people without, and how they find it difficult to deal with the subtleties that many people strew into language quite happily.

It's not a problem I have nearly as often as I used to - but I do run into people reading more into my language than I put there, or putting things into language that I don't spot.

It also sums up the sense of kinship and familiarity I felt on reading The Curious Case of the Dog in the Night-Time - not that I'm anywhere near that bad - but it reminded me quite a lot of how I felt as a child.

cheers to [livejournal.com profile] randomchris for the link.

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2009-07-28 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose literally it does but I meant to use that definition in the context that if people on the AS have a theory of mind predicated on people acting logically then their theory of mind is, when applied to non AS types, essentially wrong most of the time. Not always because human beings do on occassion act rationally and logically (just rarely ;) ).

Thus in summation I would say having a theory of mind based on logic isn't literally the same as having no theory of mind but, conversely, I'd argue it does fit with the end of the definition "to understand that others have beliefs, desires and intentions that are different from one's own.". Of course I have always taken the idea that this doesn't mean that folk on the AS believe everyone thinks the same as them at any given moment but that they believe people act in a logical fashion.

I think I should blog this (if I can actually put it through the babble filter and make it readable!) ;)