andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-07-10 02:08 pm

Belief - repost

Question three was borked. Rewritten to actually cover all the bases, and not be internally contradictory. Apologies to the 7 people who already filled it in!

[Poll #1427776]

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2009-07-11 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
"a meaningless distinction that falsely claims a difference between unbelief and nonbelief"

But as long as you're incorrectly conceding the rhetorical possibility of "believe in a negative", I'd call that an atheist.

"What do you call someone who likes football?"
"A fan"
"But what if they like football AND really like Man U"
"They're a fan."
"But those things are different!"

[identity profile] xquiq.livejournal.com 2009-07-11 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Out of curiosity, I wonder why you would find it insulting / inappropriate to insist that God did not exist?

I can understand why it would not be scientifically verifiable, but in a world where it's acceptable to claim existence of a being based on the evidence of select texts, I don't see why it should be insulting to strongly argue that God definitely doesn't exist.

That is to say, I cannot prove my assertion that God doesn't exist, but I am more than happy to go toe to toe with those who are willing to insist that he does and to argue with equal fervour.