andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-06-08 01:19 pm

Dodgy Electoral Analysis

Chatting about the electoral results, I was wondering how much skew was produced by the country being polled in regions, rather than as a whole.
Party Percentage Potential MEPs Actual MEPs Unearned MEPs
Conservative 27.7 19.1 25 5.9
UKIP 16.5 11.4 13 1.6
Labour 15.7 10.8 13 2.2
Liberal Democrat 13.7 9.4 11 1.6
Green 8.6 5.9 2 -3.9
BNP 6.2 4.3 2 -2.3
SNP 2.1 1.4 2 0.6
Plaid Cymru 0.8 0.6 1 0.4
English Democrat 1.8 1.2 0 -1.2
Christian 1.6 1.1 0 -1.1
Socialist Labour 1.1 0.8 0 -0.8


What's interesting is that Plaid Cymru (the Welsh nationalist party) only got their seat because Wales was polled as a seperate region, and it's clear that this system does allow small regional parties more clout, but minor national parties (the Greens, BNP, English Democrats, Christian People's Alliance and Socialist Labour) do worse out of it.

Not sure how I feel about that...

Edit to Add:
8.5% of people voted for a party that got no MEPs at all. That's a lot of disgruntles people, I'd imagine.

[identity profile] likeneontubing.livejournal.com 2009-06-08 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
You raise a very interesting question there I think, to what extent should region and regional representation matter in these things?

Whilst I think giving Wales/Scotland a chance to get some seats in is obviously a very good idea, I think the smaller national parties will always suffer from *something* on account of being small. If we did the vote nationally, would they be much better off? Wouldn't they still be ridiculously small?