I'm not the only one to point it out. Either it's a deliberate ploy on your part to get people to comment, or you need to spend more time thinking about providing a set of answers that actually cover the answer space.
Hint, if you have two radio buttons, then to cover the answer space, the second one has to be the reverse of the first. So for example a bad set would be What colour should Ferraris be painted A) green B) pink
and a better set of answers would be A) green, B) not green
And the actual answers should be a ticky box or similar that accepts black, red and yellow, and NOTHING ELSE (grin!) (oh, all right, maybe white)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
Hint, if you have two radio buttons, then to cover the answer space, the second one has to be the reverse of the first. So for example a bad set would be
What colour should Ferraris be painted
A) green B) pink
and a better set of answers would be
A) green, B) not green
And the actual answers should be a ticky box or similar that accepts black, red and yellow, and NOTHING ELSE (grin!) (oh, all right, maybe white)
no subject
Have you not noticed the discussion on the construction of my polls before? That's _exactly_ what they're there for.