andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2003-02-03 01:08 pm

(no subject)

Just added this one to the archive. Ooh, I got to use the word apposite!

It's amazing how much the context of a film changes its impact. I loved Fight Club because I knew almost nothing about it before I walked into the cinema, I felt let down by The Matrix because so many people had told me it was intelligent and deep, I was put off U-571 by knowing that it was factually inaccurate and I can happily say that watching Trainspotting with your parents makes it feel like a whole different film...

I'd seen Gingersnaps a year or so ago, and it came across as a fun, smart horror flick. Nothing hugely special, but definitely better than the huge number of churned out slasher movies. Watching it with a couple of girls, however, definitely moved it up the scale a several notches.

Scenes which were merely background to me assumed new significance when they obviously resonated with the girls. The whole menstruation/puberty/transformation/lycanthropy metaphor seemed much more apposite and the whole mood of the film clicked into focus far better than when I watched it with an all male audience.

So, if you fancy seeing a darkly humorous take on the werewolf genre, where a young woman is cursed to an obsession with blood, strange physical changes, unexpected hair growth and mood swings that go just a little further than most, I recommend you pick this one up. Especially if you have someone female to watch it with.

Score: 6.5, 8 if watching it in female company.

ObQuote:
Brigitte: Are you *sure* it's just cramps?
Ginger: Just so you know, the words 'just' and 'cramps', they don't go together.
__
Ginger: "No-one ever thinks chicks do shit like this. A girl can only be a slut, bitch, tease or the virgin next door. We'll just coast on how the world works."

[identity profile] kpollock.livejournal.com 2003-02-05 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
I did say 'happens'. The socks on my feet (though, funnily enough I am not actually wearing any) don't 'happen' once they are on, unless they suddenly remove themselves (to find a better life?) or go on fire or something. Which I would be very much aware of.

Interesting on the phone experiment though - was there variation? Some people (e.g. Sean) cannot talk and do anything much at the same time, even what I'd think is really simple stuff. He also seems to switch off language comprehension (which is very annoying).

I can blather away/listen whilst doing almost anything that isn't deep thinking or complicated or fast physical actions. I'm not trying to say I'd be all that different from the experimental people, just that logically, there must have been some sort of variation in ability.

Interestingly, I will not answer my phone whilst driving, but Sean will - scary as one of the things he switches 'comms' off for is most driving except in a straight line.