andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-12-12 03:30 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 12-12-2008

drplokta: (Default)

[personal profile] drplokta 2008-12-12 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
The main problem with the IWF's action was not the censorship of the image, or even of the page, but that they did it in a technically ham-fisted manner that interfered with the relationship between the client and the server for every Wikipedia page loaded by every user on the affected networks. If they'd just done it properly, there would have been almost no fuss.

[identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com 2008-12-12 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Technically that was the ISPs that implemented the IWF's blacklist. The IWF merely provide a list of sites to block, but yes, the whole thing was a massive technical cock-up and it's the fact that the ISPs cover up the blocking with faked 404-errors that bugs me more than the fact they blocked Wiki in particular. That and the blocks were stupidly easy to circumvent.

AS I read elsewhere (and I cringe at using the terms but..), the IWF is a Web 1.0 solution to a Web 2.0 problem.