Oh dear. 14/15 due to getting 6 wrong (I thought I'd not knowing a word, but now I think I just juggled them in my head wrong and didn't see one letter had four plausible words).
But I found the numeric questions really difficult. I expect it's much, much, easier if you know in advance the Qs will typically be simple algebraic relations, or whatever they are, rather than having to wonder "hold on, is that too simple for an 11 year old to know? too complex?"
I got 12/15. Still passed, but got 10, 11 and 15 wrong. I can no longer do maths because I am so woefully out of practice. I can't even remember half my gcse stuff on it :O
I did a maths psychometric test the other day and got AVERAGE score. *weep*
I went to a grammar school after the 12+...so presumably I've always been good at this sort of thing. 15/15 in 4:24. With 7 and 8 I didn't bother trying the whole words...I worked out individual key letters (the Ts on "Mast" and "Lest" correspond to the 5s on the end of two of the codes). Is that cheating?
I was not however anything special academically (8 GCSE Bs and Cs...no As. 18 points worth of A-levels. 2ii degree). Says something about the usefulness of said tests. I rather enjoyed the mental workout though.
14/15 in 4.06. I got number 10 wrong - took me ages to figure out it was just subtraction, then when I did figure it out I got so excited I did it wrong :->
But I've done loads of IQ tests (because they're fun!) and practice does make a lot of difference, which seems to defeat the point somehow.
14/15, didn't spot the interleaving sequences in the last one either ... I think it was under 10 minutes - for some reason the timer on the page insisted on counting down from 5 seconds when I pressed Start.
Is that article implying that in order to pass this 11-plus exam, one would have had to done the equivalent of getting *all* those answers correct in 10 minutes? Are 25% of children really that smart? Or how many questions would one have needed to get correct?
Finally got to take this test, after they fixed the 6-second bug. Got 13/15 in 5 minutes. The two I got wrong were the last one (had no idea, just guessed - didn't occur to me it might not be a single sequence) and one of the two code-cracking ones (embarrassing mistake, I worked it out correctly using the key-letters method and then misremembered a 4 as a 5 en route between the examples and the answers).
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Out of practice
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I think I remember that question from 35 years ago...
Funnily enough, I got stuck on 10 and 11 - I ended up guessing wrong!
no subject
no subject
But I found the numeric questions really difficult. I expect it's much, much, easier if you know in advance the Qs will typically be simple algebraic relations, or whatever they are, rather than having to wonder "hold on, is that too simple for an 11 year old to know? too complex?"
no subject
I can no longer do maths because I am so woefully out of practice. I can't even remember half my gcse stuff on it :O
I did a maths psychometric test the other day and got AVERAGE score. *weep*
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
15/15 in 4:24.
With 7 and 8 I didn't bother trying the whole words...I worked out individual key letters (the Ts on "Mast" and "Lest" correspond to the 5s on the end of two of the codes). Is that cheating?
I was not however anything special academically (8 GCSE Bs and Cs...no As. 18 points worth of A-levels. 2ii degree). Says something about the usefulness of said tests. I rather enjoyed the mental workout though.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I wouldn't think this would be a great marker as to whether or not someone had A Level / university potential, when considered in isolation.
no subject
But I've done loads of IQ tests (because they're fun!) and practice does make a lot of difference, which seems to defeat the point somehow.
Joining the herd ...
I think it was under 10 minutes - for some reason the timer on the page insisted on counting down from 5 seconds when I pressed Start.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Got 13/15 in 5 minutes. The two I got wrong were the last one (had no idea, just guessed - didn't occur to me it might not be a single sequence) and one of the two code-cracking ones (embarrassing mistake, I worked it out correctly using the key-letters method and then misremembered a 4 as a 5 en route between the examples and the answers).