andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-12-10 03:55 pm

Could you pass the 11-plus?

Check here - I got 13/15 - I ended up skipping questions 10 and 11 in order to finish inside the ten minute time limit.

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
14/15. Got the last question wrong having guessed and not spotted the sequence within a sequence. Did it within 6 minutes though

[identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
14/15 - misread q 10 somehow...

[identity profile] rhythmaning.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Damn - I got 12/15. Not that I'm competitive...

I think I remember that question from 35 years ago...

Funnily enough, I got stuck on 10 and 11 - I ended up guessing wrong!

[identity profile] themongkey.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
14/15 in 9 minutes, although I knew I'd never get the last question at around the 8 minute mark.

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh dear. 14/15 due to getting 6 wrong (I thought I'd not knowing a word, but now I think I just juggled them in my head wrong and didn't see one letter had four plausible words).

But I found the numeric questions really difficult. I expect it's much, much, easier if you know in advance the Qs will typically be simple algebraic relations, or whatever they are, rather than having to wonder "hold on, is that too simple for an 11 year old to know? too complex?"

[identity profile] likeneontubing.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I got 12/15. Still passed, but got 10, 11 and 15 wrong.
I can no longer do maths because I am so woefully out of practice. I can't even remember half my gcse stuff on it :O

I did a maths psychometric test the other day and got AVERAGE score. *weep*

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
14/15 in four minutes, followed by six minutes staring at the last question and never getting it.

[identity profile] wolflady26.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I got the same score, except that I missed 7 and 8. I didn't quite grok the code cracking.

[identity profile] thadrin.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I went to a grammar school after the 12+...so presumably I've always been good at this sort of thing.
15/15 in 4:24.
With 7 and 8 I didn't bother trying the whole words...I worked out individual key letters (the Ts on "Mast" and "Lest" correspond to the 5s on the end of two of the codes). Is that cheating?

I was not however anything special academically (8 GCSE Bs and Cs...no As. 18 points worth of A-levels. 2ii degree). Says something about the usefulness of said tests. I rather enjoyed the mental workout though.

[identity profile] cheekbones3.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
14 in four minutes. That last one annoyed me!

[identity profile] vereybowring.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Got 14 in 2.35 but got #3 wrong of all things (I hate word games and always go too fast in tests.)

[identity profile] xquiq.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
15/15 but I've always found this type of thing relatively straightforward.

I wouldn't think this would be a great marker as to whether or not someone had A Level / university potential, when considered in isolation.

[identity profile] pickwick.livejournal.com 2008-12-11 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
14/15 in 4.06. I got number 10 wrong - took me ages to figure out it was just subtraction, then when I did figure it out I got so excited I did it wrong :->

But I've done loads of IQ tests (because they're fun!) and practice does make a lot of difference, which seems to defeat the point somehow.

Joining the herd ...

[identity profile] davidcook.livejournal.com 2008-12-11 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
14/15, didn't spot the interleaving sequences in the last one either ...
I think it was under 10 minutes - for some reason the timer on the page insisted on counting down from 5 seconds when I pressed Start.
darkoshi: (Default)

[personal profile] darkoshi 2008-12-11 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
I got 15/15 with 37 seconds to spare. Quite stressful towards the end though, where I was worried I was going to run out of time.
darkoshi: (Default)

[personal profile] darkoshi 2008-12-11 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Is that article implying that in order to pass this 11-plus exam, one would have had to done the equivalent of getting *all* those answers correct in 10 minutes? Are 25% of children really that smart? Or how many questions would one have needed to get correct?

[identity profile] woodpijn.livejournal.com 2008-12-11 03:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Finally got to take this test, after they fixed the 6-second bug.
Got 13/15 in 5 minutes. The two I got wrong were the last one (had no idea, just guessed - didn't occur to me it might not be a single sequence) and one of the two code-cracking ones (embarrassing mistake, I worked it out correctly using the key-letters method and then misremembered a 4 as a 5 en route between the examples and the answers).