Date: 2008-11-14 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com
Other - no TV. :)

Date: 2008-11-14 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com
Well, as in, not that interested in watching tv-type-stuff. :)

Date: 2008-11-14 10:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] interactiveleaf.livejournal.com
I don't have TV either; I went with "I don't watch Dr Who".

Date: 2008-11-14 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com
More people should watch Basic Instinct 2.

Date: 2008-11-14 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] recycled-sales.livejournal.com
New Doctor Who?! Why was I not informed by the authorities?!

Date: 2008-11-15 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henriksdal.livejournal.com
yes - I listen to BBC radio all the time and not once in the many trails was a new Doctor Who thingy mentioned!

Date: 2008-11-14 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fannymagnate.livejournal.com
I'm a proper grown up and don't watch Dr Who after the kids have gone to bed - I prefer to watch the films of Jean-Luc Godard and Rainer Werner Fassbinder.

Date: 2008-11-14 10:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
heh :) I'd also add to that - I don't read Harry Potter or any other children's books on the basis that I'm an adult :)

Date: 2008-11-14 10:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Yeh I have limited myself to the entire cannon of works intended for adults, that is true. That said I didn't tend to read children's when I was a child either - having aspergers I prefered the encyclopedia :)

Date: 2008-11-15 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
In fairness, I don't have aspergers or anything (indeed, in tests online I come out with such a low aspie-count that I'm, like, the Anti-aspergers or something) but as a child I managed to find time for the encyclopedia, the complete works of Dickens, Austen and a number of other 'stuffy' classics (my Grandfather taught English) and children's fiction.

Date: 2008-11-14 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. And in childhood and adolescence they are, in moderation, healthy symptoms. Young things ought to want to grow. But to carry on into middle life or even into early manhood this concern about being adult is a mark of really arrested development. When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty I read them openly. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.
o "On Three Ways of Writing for Children" by CS Lewis (1952)

Date: 2008-11-14 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Yeh but for me it's not about being snobbish against literature with a certain label ('childrens' book) it's more that I'm drawn towards 'heavier' material. I just finished reding Mandelbrot's Fractals and Scaling in Finance which is incredibly dry, it's actually just a collection of academic papers. And yet the subject matter cuts right to the heart of the current financial crisis. My interest such stuff doesn't leave any time for HP and the like. No doubt a HP reader would avoid Mandelbrot for the same reason.

Date: 2008-11-14 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com
I like heavy stuff and light stuff.

* shrug *

I like some of the HP books, but not all. I also like Dry legal textbooks and heavy philosophy. I just think that being unduly fixated on one subject or another, whether it's Mandelbrot or anything else is a bit worrying.

And if it's not about being snobbish, why word your initial comment the way you did?

Date: 2008-11-15 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pickwick.livejournal.com
Well, that's not what you said! I'm sure there's plenty of "adult" material you wouldn't touch either, on those grounds.

(Me, I'm a kids' fantasy geek who also reads Hofstadter, Chomsky, etc.)

Date: 2008-11-15 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Well, that's not what you said! I'm sure there's plenty of "adult" material you wouldn't touch either, on those grounds.

True enough.

Date: 2008-11-15 09:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
I'm not that heavyweight!!! (though I get twinges of feeling probably shoudl be...) - but I find most adult fiction too lightweight/simplistic and thus kids stuff even moreso (generally - there are/were exceptions).

As a kid I read the library out of anything science-fact...

Date: 2008-11-15 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Nice come back. If this were reddit or digg you'd be getting upmods right now for effective use of of a webcomic/xkcd link :)

Is this were my argument falls down because I'm addicted to web comics? Although I'm open to the idea that webcomics are perhaps a higher form of communication than just plain words ;)

Date: 2008-11-15 12:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Is this were my argument falls down because I'm addicted to web comics?

You have an argument? I thought you just had a really boring taste in books. :-p

Date: 2008-11-15 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Different. I have a different taste in books :)

Date: 2008-11-15 01:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Potayto, potahto...

Date: 2008-11-15 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
Actually round here it's more like I say tay-ta you say spud :)

Date: 2008-11-15 01:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
I say tatties.

Date: 2008-11-15 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pennski.livejournal.com
Oh that's lovely.

I keep a jar of bubble mix by the back door, but it's not really on the same scale.

Date: 2008-11-19 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fannymagnate.livejournal.com
Sorry, but I was too busy watching "Last Year at Marienbad" to respond to this . . . And I still haven't got round to Funny Games (US).

Date: 2008-11-15 02:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com
I'll see your Godard and Fassbinder and raise you a Debord and a Straub / Huillet ;-)

Date: 2008-11-14 11:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fire-sermon.livejournal.com
You didn't have an option for 'I knew exactly when it would be on and tuned in for those three minutes.'

Date: 2008-11-15 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fire-sermon.livejournal.com
Ah - I was cheating and found out from the guy that was managing the online content for the bbc site.

Date: 2008-11-15 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pisica.livejournal.com
Nor an option for, 'I didn't know when it was on, and was afraid I'd missed it, but thankfully my partner was in the same room as the TV and could shout when it was on, so I ran through, and thus spared myself Girls Aloud and some soap opera I never watch.'

But I think that's probably too many characters for the text field. :)

Date: 2008-11-15 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pennski.livejournal.com
We started the sky plus going, and then 2 hours in started to fast forward through it, stopping for any musical numbers (ouch!) and then catching up with Dr Who.

Date: 2008-11-15 12:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pickwick.livejournal.com
Inexplicably, you don't an option for "I was subtitling the bits of CiN Scotland that we had scripts for - practically nothing - so I half-watched it while scrabbling around frantically trying to figure out what was coming next". I did manage to see it properly when it repeated...but wasn't very impressed.

Date: 2008-11-15 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henriksdal.livejournal.com
oh wow - you do subtitling? I've always wanted to meet a subtitler

Date: 2008-11-16 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pickwick.livejournal.com
Heh, yeah. I think you're the first person who's ever said that to me - it doesn't occur to most people that the job exists until I mention it! :D

Date: 2008-11-15 01:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
It's a bit lazier than the previous CIN specials - it looks like the pre-credits sequence of the Christmas special, rather than something that would stand alone (e.g. Steven Moffat's excellent CIN special last year, or the extended post-regeneration sequence we had before David Tennant's first season).

Date: 2008-11-15 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Agreed.

Re: Don't watch Dr. Who

Date: 2008-11-15 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com
I don't watch TV.

But if I did, I'd probably watch Dr. Who. :)

November 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 2nd, 2025 12:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios