andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2008-09-11 01:16 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Zoom!
From the observation last night in conversation with Lilian that people complain about speed cameras all the time, but you rarely hear anyone saying that the actual limit should be raised.
Note for for'n types - speeds are in MPH.
[Poll #1257772]
Note for for'n types - speeds are in MPH.
[Poll #1257772]
no subject
However, as I have tried to drill into people above on my previous comment, it wouldn't decrease traffic, it would decrease traffic FLOW on those particular roads. The traffic still has to go somewhere and people are clever buggers. If you put a few roads as 20mph or stick in a load of speed bumps, they will find alternatic routes. If this is the plan, great - success. If the plan is however to reduce ALL accidents, you have just moved the problem from one area to another.
no subject
Roads in built up residential areas with young families, schools etc are likely to have a higher probability of accidents occuring (not involving just veichles that is) then back roads through industrial estates...
Or as someone else has pointed out on major urban trunk roads.
no subject
no subject
Do you think that's entirely true? Do you not that think that there would gradually be a shift in the way people think about what's feasible to drive and in their behaviour - for example, planning trips to the shops more carefully if "just popping to the shop" now takes twice as long; adjusting their ideas of how far they'd plausibly commute to work, whatever...