zz: (0)
zz ([personal profile] zz) wrote in [personal profile] andrewducker 2008-08-15 07:26 pm (UTC)

not that defining sex/notsex is even useful if you're not religious/desperate to lose virginity, but i'd tend to think of it (out of habit/convention than any particular reason) as requiring penetration by a real or fake penis, or a serious amount of mutual masturbation/oral where penises are absent, with everything else as "sexual activity".

speaking of continua, i was thinking recently that the gay-straight axis should be a triangle, with asexual on the other point. but then "sexuality"'s even less quantifiable than orientation.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting