andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-07-28 09:17 pm

It's not a question of rights, it's a question of wrongs.

Over here Lilian, in her legal capacity, talks about the Mosley case, where a court decided that printing details of what Max Mosley got up to with bondage prostitutes was his own affair, and that the newspaper had no right to print pictures of it.

Which is interesting, and I have no particular argument with it. Except, as she points out, it doesn't half make you wonder where this particular slippery slope ends. If one of the prostitutes involved writes their autobiography, should that be banned? How about if they were updating their blog? How much expectation of privacy do we have when people are constantly updating the world about the state of their lives?

Certainly, spreading lies about people is wrong, but does that mean we shouldn't be allowed to say things that are true? If I were to write a blog post about having sex with Gordon Brown this morning, thus outing him to the world, would that be actionable? How about if I updated my facebook status? If I wrote a friend a letter? If I told someone down the pub? If I wrote it in my diary? At what point do we draw the line?

I'm not advocating any particular solution (although, as ever, I fall on the side of The Transparent Society), it's just one of the tensions in society that fascinates me.
[Poll #1231162]

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2008-07-28 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't ask any questions...

[identity profile] surliminal.livejournal.com 2008-07-28 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry, my bad indent (as opposed to intent :-)

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2008-07-28 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah :D

*no longer confused* :)