Kucinich polls under around 1% because under 1% of americans agree with him more than any other candidate or think he has the right skills to lead and get things done. Around 99% support someone else either disagree significantly or think he's not leadership material. It's not a big ears/short guy prejudice, although that probably doesn't help.
I think he's probably the only Old (i.e. New Deal/Great Society), pre-Clinton Democrat in the race. That hasn't been a winning presidential strategy in the US since 1976 (Reagan/Carter in 1980, Reagan/Mondale '84, Bush/Dukakis '88) and the equivalent hasn't been a winning strategy in the UK since before then (Thatcher/whoever). He's way more liberal than Labour (or at least its leadership) is here; he won't be president for the same reason Clare Short will never be PM.
no subject
Kucinich polls under around 1% because under 1% of americans agree with him more than any other candidate or think he has the right skills to lead and get things done. Around 99% support someone else either disagree significantly or think he's not leadership material. It's not a big ears/short guy prejudice, although that probably doesn't help.
I think he's probably the only Old (i.e. New Deal/Great Society), pre-Clinton Democrat in the race. That hasn't been a winning presidential strategy in the US since 1976 (Reagan/Carter in 1980, Reagan/Mondale '84, Bush/Dukakis '88) and the equivalent hasn't been a winning strategy in the UK since before then (Thatcher/whoever). He's way more liberal than Labour (or at least its leadership) is here; he won't be president for the same reason Clare Short will never be PM.
no subject
Bah.
no subject