andrewducker: (0)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote 2007-04-03 08:24 am (UTC)

I agree in certain respects - except that it's not actually audible quality that I'm too worried about ( I could live with pops and crackles) it's that music sounds somehow flatter and less interesting at lower bit-rates. I find myself getting generally bored of it more easily.

I started out with a teeny MP3 player with 16MB in it (back in the 90s), and all of my music was at 64kbps, which really brought this out (but it took me a while to realise). 128kbps seems fine to me - but I am worried that 256kbps re-encoded to 128kbps might suffer the same problem.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting