If I get into a car and say, "Hey - you drive.." I am voluntarily giving up control.
If I get drunk voluntarily, knowing I might not make the -best- decisions or have great motor control, then I am voluntarily and knowingly giving up complete control.
And I put "10" on the second because I see it as a being a 10 or 0 sort of question. Either you are or you aren't. Anything else is too problematic and needs to be defined and I don't think it can be.
I think 'depressed' is significantly different from just 'overcome with emotion'.
In general though, I think my answers would depend on how drunk someone was, how depressed someone was, what the action was, what the overall context was, etc. It could vary from 1 to 10 on both scales, depending.
How about if their actions are reactions to bad deeds by others and so justified if not proportionate?; I suspect you are asking not about acts per se, but about acts that would normally be repressed by politeness/sensibility-type inhibitions, and which a variety of causes including drink, depresion and lack of sleep may release. This puts rather a different slant on teh question of "who is responsible".
I think there's a difference between being drunk and depressed (by which I mean "suffering from depression"). They're both about your brain chemistry affecting your ability to make suitably rational choices, but with drunkenness one presumably has consciously made a choice to put oneself into that state, whereas with depression it's generally far less voluntary.
This, I guess, is at least partly why we throw people in prison for doing bad things while under the influence of alcohol, whereas we commit them to a psychiatric hospital when they do bad things due to mental illness.
I want to quantify my response a bit because I don't think the question is asked properly.
I answered '8' for both, and my reasoning is thus:
A person is 100% responsible for GETTING drunk. But once they *are* completely hammered, they are acting largely on impulse rather than considered action. Therefore I don't think it's fair to hold them 100% responsible for what they do - SO LONG AS THEY ACCEPT RESPONSIBLITY for getting themselves so wankered in the first place.
Depression is similar. A person is not responsible for BEING depressed, but they do hold some responsibility for how they cope with their depression or other strong/negative emotions. Either they cope by asking for help, or they cope by doing destructive things, and they are responsible for that.
I am very very wary of anyone using depression - or any illness other than the very severest mental disabilities - as a reason for inappropriate or illegal actions.
Drunk is a choice - easy to avoid totally, so 100% responsible - you chose to take that first drink...
Depressed or emotional is not so much - you can't stop what you feel - but (and this one one of the most important things I ever learned) you can feel emotions and *still* not let them materially affect your actions(if so doing is inappropriate or damaging to you/others you care about in the longer term). OK, not all that easy at times, but entirely possible where required.
I, too, think that this is a tough question, and in part, I'm apt to agree with the "0" or "10", no in between. However, I did use an "in between" for the answer about depression. As one person pointed out, there is a difference between being "depressed" and "being overcome by emotion".
Depression is also different from the many other mental illnesses in which people are found "not responsible" for their actions. As a person who suffers chronic major depression, I don't feel it should be targeted with "irresponsible" behavior. If you used the term "schizophrenic" or "other severe mental illness", the question would be much easier to answer. Depression can be controlled properly, but the choice to drink and drive is definitely the responsibility of the drinker.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
If I get drunk voluntarily, knowing I might not make the -best- decisions or have great motor control, then I am voluntarily and knowingly giving up complete control.
And I put "10" on the second because I see it as a being a 10 or 0 sort of question. Either you are or you aren't. Anything else is too problematic and needs to be defined and I don't think it can be.
no subject
In general though, I think my answers would depend on how drunk someone was, how depressed someone was, what the action was, what the overall context was, etc. It could vary from 1 to 10 on both scales, depending.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
D'oh
(no subject)
no subject
This, I guess, is at least partly why we throw people in prison for doing bad things while under the influence of alcohol, whereas we commit them to a psychiatric hospital when they do bad things due to mental illness.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I answered '8' for both, and my reasoning is thus:
A person is 100% responsible for GETTING drunk. But once they *are* completely hammered, they are acting largely on impulse rather than considered action. Therefore I don't think it's fair to hold them 100% responsible for what they do - SO LONG AS THEY ACCEPT RESPONSIBLITY for getting themselves so wankered in the first place.
Depression is similar. A person is not responsible for BEING depressed, but they do hold some responsibility for how they cope with their depression or other strong/negative emotions. Either they cope by asking for help, or they cope by doing destructive things, and they are responsible for that.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Depressed or emotional is not so much - you can't stop what you feel - but (and this one one of the most important things I ever learned) you can feel emotions and *still* not let them materially affect your actions(if so doing is inappropriate or damaging to you/others you care about in the longer term). OK, not all that easy at times, but entirely possible where required.
no subject
no subject
Depression is also different from the many other mental illnesses in which people are found "not responsible" for their actions. As a person who suffers chronic major depression, I don't feel it should be targeted with "irresponsible" behavior. If you used the term "schizophrenic" or "other severe mental illness", the question would be much easier to answer. Depression can be controlled properly, but the choice to drink and drive is definitely the responsibility of the drinker.