andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2006-11-22 08:53 am

[identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 10:32 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with The Hobbit is that it's not that exciting. Small Hobbit meets wizard, sets off, finds ring that makes you invisible, kills spider, gets someone else to shoot a dragon, goes home. As a book in its own right it is perfectly fine. It could be made into a perfectly good film, but compared to Lord of the Rings I think it would seem somehow lacking in grandeur.

The suggestions that it could be made into two films are frankly laughable, and the suggestion of making a third to fill in the gap between The Hobbit and LotR just shows how desperate New Line are to milk this cash cow for all they can whilst they still own the rights.

[identity profile] mirukux.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 11:21 am (UTC)(link)

[identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
are any of those that dude Geena davis is married to/used to be married to? Cos he's bad enough, certainly...

[identity profile] johnbobshaun.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
You've got to bear in mind that the last film he made was King Kong. Which, from the point of view of the studio, 1) Underperformed 2) Went way over budget.
soon_lee: Image of yeast (Saccharomyces) cells (Default)

[personal profile] soon_lee 2006-11-22 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm content with Peter Jackson's LOTR.

The Hobbit.. meh. It's very much a young reader's book in tone & scope, lacking the gravitas of LOTR. I mean, come on, the Rivendell elves singing "tra la la"?!!

Sure it'll be nice, but I never held high hopes for it happening. Even back then the situation looked messy.

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I suggested that Uwe Boll should direct the Watchmen film. No, wait - listen! Y'see although Lord of the Rings managed to keep fanboys and obsessives happy, I think that was a minor blip. Most adaptations of cult properties end up with massive threads on sweaty girlfriend-less internet fora decrying how the director "didn't get it" and didn't even pander to the geeky fanbase. I think it's safe to say that's going to happen with Watchmen. So my idea is to just go all out. Avoid -any- chance of pleasing any of the fans and just give it to Uwe Boll - that way EVERYONE can agree how it is a total abomination with no redeeming features ;-)

[identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com 2006-11-22 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It'd need to be something wildly different to be interesting.