andrewducker: (Offensive)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2006-09-10 09:52 pm

Offensiveness (request for comments)

I posted an entry earlier today with this LJ Icon.

It's not a nice LJ icon.

It's clearly offensive.

In fact the keyword for this icon is Offensive.

And [livejournal.com profile] prynne asked me if I could be convinced to delete it. Her reason being that it contains the word "retarded", and she objects to that word (link now public).

I don't disagree that it's an offensive word. I'd certainly never use it in normal conversation.

But then I'd never say any of the things in the icon. It's there, largely, as a list of things _I_ find offensive.

And I think, myself, that it serves a purpose of saying that "Andrew finds all of these statements offensive, and wouldn't care to hear them from people around him."

In particular, it says "Goths are Retarded", which I _clearly_ can't mean, as I have numerous friends who are, or have been goths, and I've seen the Sisters of Mercy live three times, and have a large collection of black t-shirts. Nobody that knows me could in any way think I mean it as something other than "Here are things that highlight idiots when they say them."

But it's not necessarily obvious from the icon. You could read it as "Here are things Andy believes." if you didn't know me very well. You could more easily read it as "Here are things Andy finds amusing."

Knowing the internet like I do, I know that it's very easy not to recognise irony ("Saying one thing and meaning something quite different"). Many's the time I've made a comment intended to be taking as silliness and had it taken seriously.

So should I take it down? Should I depend on my audience to realise what it means?

[identity profile] randomchris.livejournal.com 2006-09-11 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
I know my wife well enough to know that she'd be quite likely to find that line upsetting. No, she doesn't read your journal, but she does sometimes read over my shoulder. (And I could ask her if that line would upset her, but I'd rather not, as it probably would.)

Freedom of speech is great, but there are some things that just don't need to be said. I'm not going to try to stop you saying them, but I will say that I think this icon lowers the intellectual tone of your journal somewhat. Maybe that's more likely to persuade you :)

[identity profile] cangetmad.livejournal.com 2006-09-11 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm. I still think the context makes a difference: if you'd said "lesbians just need to meet the right man" or, rather more tastelesly "you only get raped if you're asking for it", it would still be in a context where it was clear you disagreed with the statement and I would, frankly, be able to deal with it. Some people have had such severe (or, I suppose, recent) trauma that seeing the word "rape" will cause a meltdown, but that is an awful fact for which other individuals are not responsible, in the same way as I'm not responsible for dealing with your arachnophobia. Accommodating everyone's potential fears and trauma triggers "just in case" would make speech, let alone free speech, pretty much impossible.

For people who know who I am and what my history is, I will judge them as arseholes whom I don't wish to associate with if they choose to push certain buttons knowing I'm part of their audience. But that's action for me to take.